Marginalized by the merger: Students’ perceptions of university incorporation

Carol van der Westhuizen

University of Pretoria, Faculty of Education

Tel 012 420 5633 / 082 371 371 6

cn.vdwesthuizen@gk.up.ac.za

 

The attempt by the Ministry of Education to transform the South African educational landscape by opting for mergers “to move us beyond the apartheid design of higher education” (Pandor 2005:5) led to a number of local merger studies. Although some focus on the effects of mergers/incorporations on staff members in merging institutions (Bauer & Wilkinson 2005; Becker et al. 2004; Van der Westhuizen 2004), there is a vacuum regarding the merger effects on students (see Jansen et al 2002: 171). In an attempt to break the silence, this case study examines the attitudes, perceptions and beliefs of college of education students whose courses were to be phased out as a result of the incorporation, prior to and after university incorporation.  The mainly qualitative data include archival documents, a questionnaire with closed and open-ended questions, reflections and interviews. A group of six researchers identified major emergent themes in the data sources and clustered linked questions according to the identified themes. A strong element of participant observation was ensured by the fact that both the group of six researchers (lecturers) and the students were simultaneously involved in the incorporation. While the researchers’ personal involvement could be regarded as a limitation, it is counteracted by their position of trust and empathy in regard to the students they taught. The data indicate that the upheaval caused by the incorporation, wreaked havoc in the lives of the students who expressed their abhorrence at being referred to as “pipeline students” (interpreted by them as “sickly beings”). One of the major emergent concerns in this research on the lived experiences of the students is that the total disregard of the emotional impact of the merger on students, coupled with inadequate communication regarding the merger process, exacerbates the inevitable stress associated with institutional mergers. Since the successful transformation of an institution is closely linked to motivational outcomes, a more humane approach to students during a merger is crucial. [329] 

 

* I have used the terms “merger” and “incorporation” interchangeably.